H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Zarina Diyas H2H: 2-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Zarina Diyas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 China Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Zarina Diyas
Kazakhstan Age 32 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #6 6-4 6-3 Zarina Diyas #91 Match data Oct 1, 2018 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #20 6-4 7-5 Zarina Diyas #51 Match data May 31, 2018* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 251 136 64.9% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Zarina Diyas #437 #31 1,495 1,756 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Zarina Diyas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2009 2–1 66.7% #242 1,528 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2010 2–4 33.3% #172 1,539 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2011 1–4 20.0% #227 1,504 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #264 1,477 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #163 1,477 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2014 20–14 58.8% #33 1,682 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2015 20–27 42.6% #52 1,560 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2016 8–12 40.0% #150 1,552 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2017 7–4 63.6% #66 1,665 0 1
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2018 13–19 40.6% #89 1,717 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2019 7–13 35.0% #77 1,704 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2020 5–6 45.5% #80 1,659 0 1
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2021 13–17 43.3% #102 1,688 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,052 4 8 2022 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,680 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #382 1,631 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #437 1,545 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Zarina Diyas
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 15 10 25 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 11 17 28 39.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2016 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 9 11 20 45.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 8 10 18 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 190 88 278 68.3% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 68 85 153 44.4% 19 30 49 38.8% 12 13 25 48.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 217/227 of Zarina Diyas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Zarina Diyas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/3 3.0 2.5 53.3% 69.6% 41.1% 60.7% 64.6% 56.3% 58.9%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% 2010 6/6 1.8 5.8 57.9% 62.6% 42.3% 41.2% 52.3% 53.9% 40.8%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 2.6 4.2 61.8% 61.5% 40.9% 48.2% 59.0% 54.1% 40.1%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2012 2/2 0.0 7.5 42.5% 60.7% 29.5% 23.6% 45.0% 41.7% 43.1%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2013 2/2 4.0 3.0 68.2% 67.7% 55.4% 61.1% 72.7% 64.6% 35.8%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2014 32/34 1.6 3.1 68.2% 58.4% 47.3% 49.4% 51.1% 55.1% 45.8%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2015 41/47 1.2 3.3 71.2% 57.9% 47.0% 48.3% 51.6% 54.7% 44.1%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2016 20/20 2.6 2.6 70.3% 60.5% 41.6% 48.5% 49.8% 54.9% 43.9%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2017 11/11 3.3 3.5 68.1% 64.5% 46.2% 53.5% 57.0% 58.7% 45.1%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2018 32/32 2.2 3.0 67.3% 61.4% 48.3% 52.6% 44.3% 56.7% 42.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 20/20 0.9 2.4 69.6% 59.4% 44.8% 45.3% 36.7% 55.0% 42.1%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2020 11/11 1.6 2.8 74.3% 57.0% 47.6% 53.8% 48.6% 54.4% 44.2%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2021 29/30 1.5 3.1 67.2% 60.0% 42.6% 48.1% 46.7% 54.3% 41.3%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% 2022 1/1 0.0 1.0 70.2% 56.2% 67.7% 66.7% 20.0% 59.6% 33.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 0.0 1.5 70.9% 46.7% 31.4% 45.5% 38.8% 42.6% 40.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 1.0 3.0 68.3% 61.0% 31.6% 55.6% 20.0% 51.7% 36.4%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 217/227 1.7 3.1 68.4% 59.8% 45.4% 49.3% 48.4% 55.1% 43.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Zarina Diyas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1528 105.5 +0.98 +1.13 1.348 57.6% — +48 — 66.7% +1.00 — — — +0.06
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2010 1539 114.4 +0.14 -1.62 0.883 47.6% +19 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.8 -0.06
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2011 1505 103.6 -1.72 -1.18 0.875 47.5% +17 — — 33.3% -1.08 0–2 — — +0.16
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2012 1477 95.3 -2.37 -3.62 0.739 42.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2013 1478 100.3 -1.99 -0.40 1.012 50.7% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–2 — +0.31
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2014 1683 130.0 -0.83 +1.87 1.021 50.5% -29 -121 -28 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 7–4 (64%) 111.0 +0.75
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2015 1561 125.0 -2.62 +2.02 0.975 49.5% -15 -26 +133 47.0% -0.32 3–9 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 91.8 +1.00
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2016 1553 119.4 -0.44 +0.63 0.974 49.5% +1 -18 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 +0.38
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2017 1665 121.5 +1.12 +0.16 1.091 52.1% +6 — +15 57.7% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.1 +0.69
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2018 1718 138.2 -0.01 -0.24 0.989 49.8% +12 -125 — 44.9% -0.07 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -2.35
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1704 128.4 -1.13 -1.09 0.937 48.5% +30 — — 44.2% -0.58 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.02
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2020 1660 115.9 -0.51 +0.34 0.969 49.6% +68 -136 — 44.8% -0.24 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -0.43
27 2025 1966 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +59 -128 -253 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 101.6 +0.92 2021 1688 125.7 -1.93 -1.44 0.902 47.7% +47 -117 -89 43.8% -0.62 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -1.46
28 2026 2053 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% +1 -104 -111 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.0 -0.80 2022 1681 107.4 -0.79 +5.23 0.833 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1631 100.1 -0.16 -2.90 0.697 41.4% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.15
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1549 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1546 107.0 -0.57 -1.69 0.752 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +35 -157 -155 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.0 -1.65 — 1756 131.4 -1.07 +0.30 0.966 49.3% +8 -81 +46 46.2% -0.25 32–36 (47%) 22–29 (43%) 97.4 -0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.