H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Danielle Lao H2H: 1-0
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Danielle Lao in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2017 Stanford third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 35
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2017* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-4 6-3 | Danielle Lao | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danielle Lao | #1,235 | #152 | 378 | 1,552 | 1 | 9 | 10.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Danielle Lao | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #314 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |