H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 0-1
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Vikhlyantseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2017 Miami first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Lara Arruabarrena | 7-5 6-1 | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |