H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Vitalia Diatchenko
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Natalia Vikhlyantseva vs Vitalia Diatchenko.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,693 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | Vitalia Diatchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #134 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |