Nicole Gibbs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 0 | 4 | 4 | Apr 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 13, 2017 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Heather Watson | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 2017 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 16, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Nicole Gibbs vs Daniela Seguel H2H: 0-1
Daniela Seguel holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Gibbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniela Seguel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Seguel won the 2018 Bogotá Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Seguel | 6-2 6-2 | Nicole Gibbs | Match data | Apr 12, 2018* | R32 | Bogotá Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole Gibbs | #175 | #68 | 946 | 1,690 | 33 | 59 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniela Seguel | #951 | #162 | 365 | 1,528 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicole Gibbs | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #109 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #123 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #282 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nicole Gibbs | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2012 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2019 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 31 | 47 | 78 | 39.7% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 83/94 of Nicole Gibbs's and 7/7 of Daniela Seguel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Nicole Gibbs | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2012 | 6/6 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 56.5% | 54.1% | 41.4% | 46.9% | 35.9% | 48.3% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 57.4% | 53.7% | 40.6% | 46.8% | 39.6% | 48.2% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 9/11 | 1.1 | 4.7 | 55.4% | 61.2% | 46.0% | 53.0% | 53.3% | 54.7% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 11/15 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 55.5% | 58.8% | 49.3% | 51.0% | 46.2% | 54.6% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 25/29 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 61.3% | 63.6% | 43.8% | 50.2% | 48.1% | 55.9% | 44.7% | 2016 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 72.1% | 51.6% | 45.8% | 53.3% | 55.6% | 50.0% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2017 | 18/19 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 60.2% | 58.8% | 42.9% | 52.5% | 38.7% | 52.3% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 7/7 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 59.6% | 59.6% | 41.8% | 40.3% | 37.7% | 52.4% | 35.7% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 75.3% | 56.7% | 35.6% | 62.4% | 43.8% | 51.8% | 49.1% |
| 26 | 2019 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 59.6% | 56.6% | 40.1% | 59.7% | 34.7% | 50.1% | 44.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 60.4% | 70.3% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 40.0% | 62.3% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 75.6% | 55.5% | 40.8% | 71.4% | 41.7% | 52.2% | 47.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 73.3% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 14.3% | 60.0% | 43.3% | 37.7% |
| Career | — | 83/94 | 1.1 | 3.4 | 58.9% | 60.1% | 44.0% | 50.4% | 43.7% | 53.6% | 41.6% | — | 7/7 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 74.6% | 54.7% | 37.0% | 56.8% | 47.2% | 50.4% | 46.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nicole Gibbs | Daniela Seguel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2012 | 1505 | 109.0 | -2.02 | +0.08 | 0.764 | 44.2% | +11 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 1509 | 106.7 | -1.19 | -0.03 | 0.868 | 46.6% | +9 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 1547 | 108.6 | -2.13 | -2.66 | 0.824 | 46.3% | +25 | — | — | 44.4% | -0.93 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | +0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 1504 | 106.2 | -2.08 | +0.98 | 0.955 | 49.1% | +51 | -19 | — | 30.3% | -1.06 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–5 (0%) | 94.8 | +0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 1579 | 124.9 | -0.86 | +1.29 | 1.013 | 50.2% | +27 | -135 | — | 45.8% | -0.20 | 2–5 (29%) | 0–1 | — | +0.37 | 2016 | 1495 | 102.1 | -2.00 | -0.54 | 0.854 | 46.4% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.15 |
| 24 | 2017 | 1546 | 114.2 | -2.56 | -1.08 | 0.851 | 46.5% | +3 | — | — | 37.2% | -1.12 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.04 | 2017 | 1465 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2018 | 1513 | 110.7 | +0.08 | -2.80 | 0.750 | 44.4% | +14 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.28 | 2018 | 1478 | 97.2 | -3.67 | -0.05 | 1.017 | 50.3% | — | +15 | — | 66.7% | +1.00 | — | — | — | +0.27 |
| 26 | 2019 | 1579 | 116.8 | +0.94 | +1.74 | 0.894 | 47.3% | +1 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.37 | 2019 | 1462 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2020 | 1573 | 109.7 | -1.74 | +0.55 | 0.883 | 48.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | 2020 | 1445 | 93.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1473 | 103.9 | +0.09 | +1.01 | 0.988 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 40.0% | +0.20 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1444 | 105.7 | -1.72 | -1.70 | 0.665 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1442 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1690 | 120.8 | -1.49 | -0.17 | 0.895 | 47.6% | +20 | -69 | — | 38.2% | -0.92 | 10–17 (37%) | 5–8 (38%) | 92.7 | +1.11 | — | 1528 | 99.0 | -2.08 | -0.05 | 0.928 | 48.2% | — | +15 | — | 43.8% | -0.19 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +9.57 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniela Seguel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ipek Oz | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 7, 2022 | H2H |
| Harmony Tan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Clara Tauson | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Ana Bogdan | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Tatjana Maria | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 13, 2018 | H2H |