H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Nina Stojanovic vs Ons Jabeur H2H: 1-0
Nina Stojanovic holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nina Stojanovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nina Stojanovic won the 2017 Shenzhen fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2017* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nina Stojanovic | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nina Stojanovic | #493 | #81 | 983 | 1,686 | 24 | 37 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nina Stojanovic | Ons Jabeur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #248 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 10–5 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #250 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |