H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Danka Kovinic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Danka Kovinic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |