H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Tereza Martincova H2H: 0-1
Tereza Martincova holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Parrizas Diaz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tereza Martincova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tereza Martincova won the 2022 Cincinnati second round 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 31
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2022* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tereza Martincova | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tereza Martincova | #283 | #40 | 1,293 | 1,800 | 70 | 102 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Tereza Martincova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #296 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #180 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #142 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #197 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #120 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #48 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |