H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Nuria Parrizas Diaz vs Urszula Radwanska H2H: 1-0
Nuria Parrizas Diaz holds a 1–0 lead over Urszula Radwanska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Parrizas Diaz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nuria Parrizas Diaz won the 2021 Prague third round 2-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 35
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2021* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | 2-6 6-3 6-1 | Urszula Radwanska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nuria Parrizas Diaz | #323 | #45 | 1,190 | 1,744 | 40 | 61 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Urszula Radwanska | #493 | #29 | 1,565 | 1,747 | 99 | 130 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nuria Parrizas Diaz | Urszula Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #313 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #252 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #129 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #70 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #31 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #40 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #179 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #94 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #257 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #125 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #216 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |