H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Olga Danilovic vs Misaki Doi H2H: 1-0
Olga Danilovic holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olga Danilovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olga Danilovic won the 2022 Lausanne third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 25
Left-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2022 | Transylvania Open | WTA 250 | Q1 | Hard | Olga Danilovic | 5-7 6-0 7-6(3) | Misaki Doi | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2022* | Lausanne | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Olga Danilovic | 6-3 6-3 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olga Danilovic | #268 | #34 | 1,534 | 1,889 | 54 | 50 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olga Danilovic | Misaki Doi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–1 | 85.7% | #108 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #136 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #155 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 12–5 | 70.6% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #67 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #268 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |