H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 3-2
Ons Jabeur holds a 3–2 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2022 Doha quarterfinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2022* | Doha | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 6-1 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-4 (ret.) | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-3 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Aug 18, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2018* | Moscow | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-1 | Anett Kontaveit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |