H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Martina Trevisan H2H: 1-1
Ons Jabeur and Martina Trevisan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 1–0 on clay, while Martina Trevisan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Trevisan won the 2023 Guadalajara fourth round 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 32
Left-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2023* | Guadalajara | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Martina Trevisan | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Ons Jabeur | 6-2 6-2 | Martina Trevisan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Martina Trevisan | #405 | #18 | 1,878 | 1,763 | 51 | 86 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Martina Trevisan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #156 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #112 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #42 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #481 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #405 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |