H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Yingying Duan H2H: 0-1
Yingying Duan holds a 1–0 lead over Ons Jabeur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yingying Duan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yingying Duan won the 2018 Doha second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2018* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yingying Duan | 6-2 6-3 | Ons Jabeur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ons Jabeur | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |