H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Patricia Maria Tig vs Denisa Satralova H2H: 0-1
Denisa Satralova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Satralova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Satralova won the 2016 Tashkent fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 31
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2016* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Denisa Satralova | 7-5 6-2 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,739 | 40 | 52 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 43 | 47 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #232 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |