H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Denisa Satralova holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Maria Tig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Satralova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Satralova won the 2016 Tashkent second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Satralova | 7-5 6-2 | Patricia Maria Tig | Match data | Sep 29, 2016* | R16 | Tashkent | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,743 | 41 | 52 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Denisa Satralova | #823 | #55 | 1,029 | 1,726 | 42 | 47 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #108 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #108 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #232 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #62 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #92 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #130 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2015 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2014 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2020 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2019 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 32 | 31 | 63 | 50.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 86/90 of Patricia Maria Tig's and 78/90 of Denisa Satralova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2015 | 7/9 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 66.4% | 60.7% | 49.6% | 63.7% | 63.0% | 57.9% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 19/19 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 58.4% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 53.4% | 42.6% | 2014 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 67.2% | 59.0% | 40.7% | 40.7% | 41.8% | 52.9% | 45.2% |
| 22 | 2017 | 11/13 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 57.8% | 42.5% | 43.5% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 38.3% | 2015 | 15/26 | 1.5 | 4.9 | 66.0% | 61.1% | 52.7% | 52.1% | 50.2% | 58.2% | 39.8% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 29/30 | 1.9 | 4.9 | 62.8% | 61.9% | 42.9% | 46.8% | 46.2% | 55.0% | 43.2% |
| 24 | 2019 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 63.3% | 46.2% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 46.2% | 2017 | 15/15 | 1.8 | 5.5 | 60.5% | 61.9% | 41.8% | 37.1% | 43.3% | 54.1% | 40.0% |
| 25 | 2020 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 64.4% | 43.6% | 54.4% | 59.3% | 56.0% | 49.3% | 2018 | 10/10 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 62.2% | 63.6% | 44.3% | 57.2% | 54.8% | 56.3% | 42.1% |
| 26 | 2021 | 12/12 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 52.3% | 38.0% | 2019 | 5/5 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 67.2% | 59.5% | 42.6% | 59.7% | 19.1% | 54.0% | 32.0% |
| 28 | 2023 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 59.7% | 50.8% | 36.9% | 46.5% | 44.6% | 45.2% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 86/93 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 60.2% | 60.3% | 43.1% | 53.9% | 46.5% | 53.6% | 43.2% | — | 78/90 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 63.4% | 61.6% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 45.6% | 55.4% | 41.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Denisa Satralova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1532 | 106.0 | -1.09 | +1.08 | 1.048 | 50.8% | +14 | — | — | 52.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 1527 | 104.9 | -1.75 | -1.01 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -21 | +55 | — | 44.7% | -0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.3 | +0.41 | 2014 | 1555 | 110.0 | +0.56 | -0.65 | 0.960 | 49.1% | +22 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 2–0 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1501 | 110.1 | -3.01 | -2.64 | 0.788 | 44.5% | +29 | +16 | — | 30.4% | -1.48 | 0–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.05 | 2015 | 1676 | 121.9 | +0.96 | -1.38 | 0.954 | 48.9% | -12 | -120 | — | 53.1% | +0.06 | 8–4 (67%) | 7–2 (78%) | 109.8 | -1.19 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1672 | 123.6 | -0.60 | +0.14 | 0.960 | 49.2% | +18 | — | -95 | 47.5% | -0.31 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.3 | -0.89 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1660 | 117.4 | -0.28 | +1.62 | 1.094 | 52.2% | -105 | +70 | — | 64.3% | +0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.92 | 2017 | 1562 | 104.5 | -1.52 | -2.22 | 0.872 | 46.8% | +6 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.32 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.5 | +0.17 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1728 | 126.3 | -0.51 | +3.24 | 1.123 | 52.8% | -128 | +65 | — | 65.7% | +1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.17 | 2018 | 1601 | 120.5 | -0.67 | +0.07 | 0.962 | 49.7% | +16 | -95 | -10 | 50.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | -0.38 |
| 26 | 2021 | 1626 | 106.9 | -1.94 | -2.64 | 0.797 | 45.6% | -63 | +83 | -83 | 34.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.48 | 2019 | 1560 | 104.7 | -0.96 | -2.15 | 0.695 | 43.1% | +23 | — | — | 18.2% | -2.46 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1538 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 1534 | 106.6 | -5.52 | -1.65 | 0.756 | 43.5% | +4 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.1 | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1554 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1469 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | 42.9% | -0.28 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1743 | 115.2 | -1.84 | -0.19 | 0.930 | 48.5% | -28 | +59 | -83 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 10–16 (38%) | 13–9 (59%) | 98.4 | +3.20 | — | 1726 | 121.1 | -0.45 | -0.80 | 0.924 | 48.4% | +9 | -114 | -59 | 45.5% | -0.43 | 17–9 (65%) | 15–8 (65%) | 112.6 | -2.82 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 15, 2016 | H2H |
| Johanna Konta | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 13, 2016 | H2H |
| Anett Kontaveit | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 4, 2018 | H2H |