H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Patricia Maria Tig vs Laura Robson.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Robson | Match data | Apr 2, 2016 | Q1 | Charleston Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | #417 | #56 | 1,284 | 1,743 | 41 | 52 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Robson | #764 | #27 | 1,685 | 1,710 | 39 | 63 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #217 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #53 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #44 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #123 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #916 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #108 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #232 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #222 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #114 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #436 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 20 | 2015 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2017 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% | 19 | 21 | 40 | 47.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | 22 | 33 | 55 | 40.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 86/90 of Patricia Maria Tig's and 95/101 of Laura Robson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1/1 | 10.0 | 14.0 | 59.6% | 66.1% | 42.1% | 61.5% | 50.0% | 56.4% | 37.8% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6/6 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 63.7% | 69.3% | 38.8% | 68.2% | 31.9% | 58.6% | 30.7% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8/8 | 2.4 | 5.8 | 54.8% | 65.8% | 40.9% | 41.9% | 43.5% | 54.4% | 42.4% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 28/31 | 4.2 | 5.8 | 57.1% | 68.1% | 44.4% | 51.4% | 44.3% | 57.9% | 43.5% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 37/40 | 4.5 | 5.8 | 55.6% | 69.7% | 43.4% | 54.0% | 44.4% | 58.0% | 42.6% |
| 20 | 2015 | 7/9 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 66.4% | 60.7% | 49.6% | 63.7% | 63.0% | 57.9% | 44.1% | 2014 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 59.1% | 55.8% | 36.7% | 41.7% | 50.0% | 47.7% | 34.7% |
| 21 | 2016 | 19/19 | 1.9 | 6.6 | 58.4% | 60.6% | 43.5% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 53.4% | 42.6% | 2015 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 11.0 | 57.6% | 68.6% | 35.7% | 66.4% | 34.1% | 54.9% | 38.1% |
| 22 | 2017 | 11/13 | 0.8 | 4.0 | 55.1% | 57.8% | 42.5% | 43.5% | 28.3% | 51.4% | 38.3% | 2016 | 9/9 | 2.8 | 5.3 | 56.5% | 58.2% | 41.5% | 51.8% | 36.2% | 51.0% | 38.0% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 58.7% | 66.8% | 43.5% | 21.4% | 3.6% | 57.1% | 34.4% |
| 24 | 2019 | 12/12 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 64.8% | 63.3% | 46.2% | 65.0% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 16/16 | 1.4 | 4.8 | 61.4% | 64.4% | 43.6% | 54.4% | 59.3% | 56.0% | 49.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 12/12 | 1.8 | 4.7 | 58.2% | 60.5% | 40.4% | 54.5% | 40.9% | 52.3% | 38.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | 59.7% | 50.8% | 36.9% | 46.5% | 44.6% | 45.2% | 41.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 86/93 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 60.2% | 60.3% | 43.1% | 53.9% | 46.5% | 53.6% | 43.2% | — | 95/102 | 4.1 | 5.8 | 56.8% | 67.4% | 42.7% | 52.3% | 41.8% | 56.8% | 41.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Patricia Maria Tig | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1490 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.05 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1484 | 103.3 | -0.52 | +0.53 | 0.867 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1474 | 102.2 | +0.56 | -5.19 | 0.742 | 45.8% | — | — | +98 | 0.0% | -2.40 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.50 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1508 | 110.8 | +0.58 | -0.57 | 0.932 | 48.6% | +1 | — | +42 | 26.7% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1658 | 135.1 | +1.17 | +0.07 | 1.034 | 51.0% | -32 | -64 | -60 | 52.2% | +0.28 | 4–5 (44%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.4 | -0.14 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1662 | 129.1 | +1.89 | -0.67 | 1.015 | 50.1% | -53 | -51 | -31 | 46.2% | -0.04 | 6–7 (46%) | 3–9 (25%) | 96.6 | -0.17 |
| 20 | 2015 | 1532 | 106.0 | -1.09 | +1.08 | 1.048 | 50.8% | +14 | — | — | 52.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.85 | 2014 | 1630 | 100.1 | -4.77 | -2.42 | 0.663 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1527 | 104.9 | -1.75 | -1.01 | 0.914 | 48.2% | -21 | +55 | — | 44.7% | -0.62 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.3 | +0.41 | 2015 | 1595 | 101.1 | -0.86 | -1.36 | 0.846 | 46.6% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.19 |
| 22 | 2017 | 1501 | 110.1 | -3.01 | -2.64 | 0.788 | 44.5% | +29 | +16 | — | 30.4% | -1.48 | 0–1 | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.05 | 2016 | 1512 | 105.4 | -2.56 | -1.79 | 0.776 | 45.0% | +6 | +50 | — | 15.8% | -2.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.25 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1465 | 96.8 | -2.08 | -0.78 | 0.802 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1660 | 117.4 | -0.28 | +1.62 | 1.094 | 52.2% | -105 | +70 | — | 64.3% | +0.97 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | +0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2020 | 1728 | 126.3 | -0.51 | +3.24 | 1.123 | 52.8% | -128 | +65 | — | 65.7% | +1.06 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2021 | 1626 | 106.9 | -1.94 | -2.64 | 0.797 | 45.6% | -63 | +83 | -83 | 34.6% | -1.00 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | 95.9 | -0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 1534 | 106.6 | -5.52 | -1.65 | 0.756 | 43.5% | +4 | — | — | 28.6% | -2.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.1 | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1554 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2025 | 1469 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | 42.9% | -0.28 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1743 | 115.2 | -1.84 | -0.19 | 0.930 | 48.5% | -28 | +59 | -83 | 47.1% | -0.38 | 10–16 (38%) | 13–9 (59%) | 98.4 | +3.20 | — | 1710 | 126.6 | +0.75 | -0.88 | 0.952 | 49.1% | -36 | -35 | -6 | 39.8% | -0.43 | 11–16 (41%) | 9–18 (33%) | 96.1 | -0.87 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Anastasija Sevastova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayumi Morita | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 25, 2013 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 29, 2016 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 10, 2013 | H2H |
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 28, 2013 | H2H |
| Daniela Hantuchova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 13, 2013 | H2H |