H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 2-1
Paula Badosa holds a 2–1 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2026 Miami first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2026 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 7-5 6-3 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2026 | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
| May 12, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 6-2 6-1 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 171 | 112 | 60.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,876 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |