Paula Badosa
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | 5 | 4 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jan 23, 2025 | H2H |
| Elena Rybakina | 2 | 5 | 7 | Jan 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 4, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Natalia Vikhlyantseva H2H: 0-1
Natalia Vikhlyantseva holds a 1–0 lead over Paula Badosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Vikhlyantseva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natalia Vikhlyantseva won the 2019 Libéma Open second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-1 6-1 | Paula Badosa | Match data | Jun 14, 2019* | R16 | Libéma Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | 6-2 6-4 | Paula Badosa | Match data | May 4, 2018 | Q1 | Madrid Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #87 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,039 | 178 | 116 | 60.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Natalia Vikhlyantseva | #1,034 | #54 | 1,070 | 1,686 | 34 | 56 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–19 | 20.8% | #134 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #8 | 1,976 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,835 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #195 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,920 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #382 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,017 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #25 | 1,936 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #87 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2015 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 2018 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 21 | 2019 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2018 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2021 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 20 | 14 | 34 | 58.8% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 70.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 97 | 67 | 164 | 59.1% | 63 | 33 | 96 | 65.6% | 18 | 16 | 34 | 52.9% | — | 16 | 29 | 45 | 35.6% | 11 | 19 | 30 | 36.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 274/300 of Paula Badosa's and 87/90 of Natalia Vikhlyantseva's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2015 | 4/5 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 70.5% | 63.4% | 41.3% | 56.3% | 64.7% | 57.1% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 62.0% | 60.2% | 52.4% | 52.4% | 43.8% | 57.0% | 31.7% | 2015 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 57.6% | 66.8% | 39.7% | 54.5% | 48.4% | 54.8% | 40.0% |
| 19 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 49.3% | 55.9% | 37.1% | 53.8% | 80.0% | 46.4% | 43.3% | 2016 | 3/3 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.8% | 68.8% | 42.5% | 39.3% | 46.8% | 58.6% | 40.8% |
| 20 | 2018 | 4/4 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 55.9% | 60.1% | 42.2% | 51.1% | 52.7% | 52.4% | 37.2% | 2017 | 30/31 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 61.4% | 66.1% | 45.6% | 56.5% | 47.6% | 57.8% | 42.1% |
| 21 | 2019 | 16/16 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 57.7% | 68.3% | 45.9% | 53.9% | 37.6% | 58.1% | 37.8% | 2018 | 22/24 | 2.6 | 4.1 | 62.1% | 62.5% | 43.8% | 52.1% | 41.2% | 55.1% | 40.2% |
| 22 | 2020 | 11/11 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 65.8% | 45.1% | 48.4% | 51.4% | 58.6% | 47.5% | 2019 | 19/19 | 1.5 | 5.7 | 61.9% | 65.1% | 46.0% | 61.8% | 52.2% | 57.8% | 44.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 56/60 | 3.9 | 5.4 | 64.6% | 69.8% | 45.0% | 56.2% | 48.7% | 61.0% | 45.2% | 2020 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 59.2% | 61.9% | 48.3% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 56.3% | 39.7% |
| 24 | 2022 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 62.4% | 66.1% | 47.1% | 52.7% | 46.2% | 59.2% | 44.4% | 2021 | 8/8 | 1.6 | 8.0 | 59.1% | 62.9% | 37.0% | 54.6% | 49.3% | 52.8% | 46.4% |
| 25 | 2023 | 26/27 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 56.9% | 69.6% | 49.2% | 58.1% | 47.2% | 60.6% | 45.3% | 2022 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 59.5% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 43.2% | 35.0% |
| 26 | 2024 | 55/57 | 4.8 | 5.7 | 56.6% | 71.2% | 46.9% | 63.8% | 52.2% | 60.3% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 17/31 | 4.9 | 4.8 | 61.5% | 72.0% | 47.1% | 57.6% | 50.0% | 62.7% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 30/33 | 3.9 | 6.9 | 56.0% | 67.4% | 40.6% | 50.3% | 38.8% | 55.6% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 274/300 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 60.2% | 68.6% | 45.8% | 56.1% | 47.6% | 59.5% | 43.9% | — | 87/90 | 2.5 | 4.8 | 61.3% | 64.5% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 46.6% | 56.4% | 42.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Natalia Vikhlyantseva | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2015 | 1523 | 117.6 | -0.54 | -1.81 | 0.940 | 48.0% | +27 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.38 | — | — | — | -0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 1477 | 96.2 | -0.29 | -3.37 | 0.738 | 45.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | — | — | +0.43 | 2015 | 1500 | 106.1 | -1.22 | +0.71 | 0.886 | 47.9% | +20 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1458 | 100.2 | +0.14 | -0.68 | 0.808 | 45.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2016 | 1585 | 110.1 | +1.88 | -1.70 | 0.986 | 49.6% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.10 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1529 | 108.0 | -1.53 | -3.44 | 0.782 | 45.8% | — | +71 | — | 50.0% | +0.63 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 | 2017 | 1648 | 124.3 | +1.14 | -1.22 | 0.998 | 50.0% | +5 | -174 | +30 | 48.5% | +0.01 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.61 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1601 | 111.9 | +0.53 | -2.84 | 0.902 | 48.2% | -128 | +67 | +50 | 44.1% | -0.59 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.03 | 2018 | 1568 | 117.8 | -1.37 | -1.37 | 0.894 | 47.8% | +20 | -72 | +61 | 28.3% | -1.19 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.0 | -1.34 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1665 | 124.1 | +1.36 | +1.56 | 1.149 | 53.2% | -156 | +111 | — | 56.0% | +0.92 | 3–0 (100%) | — | — | +0.96 | 2019 | 1626 | 125.8 | -0.20 | +0.37 | 1.042 | 51.2% | -7 | -45 | +34 | 50.0% | +0.33 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.34 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1976 | 151.5 | +4.20 | +2.86 | 1.159 | 52.9% | -104 | +26 | -291 | 66.2% | +1.16 | 16–6 (73%) | 12–8 (60%) | 111.9 | -0.18 | 2020 | 1575 | 106.6 | -0.44 | +0.12 | 0.910 | 47.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.6 | +2.76 | +2.01 | 1.087 | 51.9% | +1 | +145 | -104 | 60.9% | +0.69 | 9–5 (64%) | 14–4 (78%) | 106.3 | +0.32 | 2021 | 1543 | 101.7 | -1.92 | +0.59 | 0.983 | 49.5% | — | +35 | — | 42.1% | -0.31 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.47 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1921 | 154.7 | +3.30 | +2.60 | 1.150 | 52.7% | -57 | +106 | — | 65.5% | +1.26 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 98.3 | -0.83 | 2022 | 1477 | 94.3 | -2.22 | -0.26 | 0.617 | 39.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| 26 | 2024 | 2018 | 157.3 | +3.81 | +3.36 | 1.137 | 53.0% | -7 | -46 | -166 | 65.6% | +1.12 | 14–8 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.4 | -0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1937 | 147.3 | +3.99 | +0.17 | 1.134 | 52.7% | +54 | +1 | -93 | 60.9% | +0.62 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–5 (58%) | 99.3 | +0.71 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1866 | 140.6 | -0.44 | +0.06 | 0.965 | 49.3% | +29 | +105 | -63 | 49.3% | -0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–6 (40%) | 92.7 | -1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2040 | 151.8 | +2.70 | +1.68 | 1.083 | 51.8% | -25 | +69 | -115 | 60.1% | +0.73 | 59–35 (63%) | 48–33 (59%) | 108.3 | -0.33 | — | 1686 | 120.5 | -0.18 | -0.67 | 0.968 | 49.4% | +7 | -58 | +38 | 41.9% | -0.33 | 8–19 (30%) | 5–12 (29%) | 89.4 | +0.43 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Natalia Vikhlyantseva
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia Goerges | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 28, 2019 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 20, 2019 | H2H |
| Daria Saville | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Kiki Bertens | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 15, 2019 | H2H |
| Kristyna Pliskova | 1 | 1 | 2 | May 1, 2019 | H2H |