H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Pauline Parmentier vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 1-1

Pauline Parmentier and Sabine Lisicki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on clay, while Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2018 Budapest first round 0-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Sabine Lisicki
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabine Lisicki #173 0-6 6-4 6-2 Pauline Parmentier #92 Match data Feb 22, 2018* R32 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pauline Parmentier #66 6-4 6-4 Sabine Lisicki #12 Match data May 24, 2012* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,921 211 176 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pauline Parmentier Sabine Lisicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,608 0 0
19 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,794 0 1
20 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,659 0 1
21 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,878 0 3
22 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2 2012 17–19 47.2% #37 1,720 0 3
23 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,844 0 3
24 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,818 0 4
25 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,795 0 4
26 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2 2016 15–21 41.7% #93 1,639 0 4
27 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2 2017 5–5 50.0% #220 1,633 0 4
28 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,547 0 4
29 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,478 0 4
30 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,574 0 4
33 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,568 0 4
34 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pauline Parmentier Sabine Lisicki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 13 27 51.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 15 11 26 57.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 19 9 28 67.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% — — — —
22 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
23 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 18 11 29 62.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
24 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
25 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
26 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
33 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — 128 113 241 53.1% 38 43 81 46.9% 45 20 65 69.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's and 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pauline Parmentier Sabine Lisicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 3.0 8.0 49.4% 65.8% 35.9% 45.5% 33.3% 50.6% 42.0%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 49.0% 48.0% 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 47.1% 30.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 27/34 4.6 7.2 56.7% 68.5% 38.4% 52.4% 54.9% 55.4% 46.0%
19 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8% 2009 41/46 4.9 6.3 54.0% 70.6% 44.5% 47.2% 52.2% 58.6% 44.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 13/13 4.5 5.5 52.1% 66.4% 47.9% 56.4% 41.1% 57.5% 44.1%
21 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4% 2011 44/48 5.4 4.0 54.1% 74.3% 49.2% 62.2% 50.3% 62.9% 47.5%
22 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6% 2012 29/36 4.6 5.3 56.4% 65.4% 43.5% 48.7% 49.9% 55.8% 42.5%
23 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8% 2013 51/53 5.7 3.7 55.8% 71.5% 47.1% 57.6% 46.8% 60.6% 44.9%
24 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2% 2014 44/48 5.3 6.0 56.2% 66.5% 42.2% 53.2% 52.3% 55.9% 44.9%
25 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2% 2015 38/41 6.1 5.5 61.7% 68.6% 49.6% 51.9% 45.5% 61.2% 41.8%
26 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7% 2016 30/36 4.1 5.1 56.7% 65.7% 45.0% 54.8% 50.2% 57.0% 42.3%
27 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1% 2017 7/10 5.0 5.3 57.0% 65.3% 43.1% 49.3% 44.1% 55.9% 38.7%
28 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3% 2018 9/9 4.7 6.8 53.8% 66.4% 38.0% 51.6% 47.3% 53.6% 44.3%
29 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3% 2019 4/4 7.0 5.0 50.7% 68.5% 43.6% 35.5% 31.3% 56.1% 34.9%
30 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7% 2022 4/4 6.0 6.0 55.5% 72.1% 44.7% 61.8% 20.8% 59.9% 37.8%
33 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9% 2023 3/3 9.0 7.3 50.8% 69.6% 47.4% 64.9% 17.8% 57.6% 34.6%
34 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9% — 346/387 5.2 5.3 56.0% 69.0% 45.2% 53.8% 48.5% 58.5% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pauline Parmentier Sabine Lisicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1490 97.8 -4.35 +1.90 0.851 46.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1475 92.7 -4.39 -4.73 0.575 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1609 133.9 +0.46 +1.65 1.031 50.7% +18 -91 — 48.8% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 -0.68
19 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04 2009 1795 142.8 +2.82 +1.50 1.080 51.5% -77 -94 -115 67.0% +1.00 5–9 (36%) 8–5 (62%) 101.1 -1.35
20 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10 2010 1660 119.1 +0.56 +0.05 1.039 50.7% -50 — — 39.1% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.00
21 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74 2011 1878 150.7 +6.12 +3.41 1.281 54.9% -103 -151 +55 71.6% +1.55 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 -1.88
22 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83 2012 1720 130.9 +0.96 +0.55 0.960 49.3% -29 -44 +213 50.0% -0.14 9–9 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.1 -0.58
23 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22 2013 1844 146.6 +4.46 +1.57 1.140 52.5% -62 -114 +222 64.1% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.7 -1.08
24 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96 2014 1818 138.6 +0.60 +1.87 1.017 50.4% -31 -117 +227 56.5% +0.41 13–7 (65%) 3–5 (38%) 102.1 -0.86
25 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55 2015 1795 140.5 +2.78 +0.69 1.077 51.3% +8 -130 +203 55.2% +0.35 5–11 (31%) 9–9 (50%) 94.4 -0.18
26 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14 2016 1640 122.1 +0.47 -0.96 0.982 49.4% +15 -29 +307 46.3% -0.07 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 85.1 +0.16
27 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02 2017 1634 104.3 -1.13 -0.41 0.878 47.6% +5 — +286 50.0% -0.55 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.0 +0.09
28 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15 2018 1547 109.2 -1.76 -0.60 0.954 48.7% +1 — — 47.6% -0.28 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.66
29 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21 2019 1478 99.2 +1.15 -1.10 0.795 44.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — -0.75
30 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66 2020 1519 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14 2022 1575 103.5 -0.52 -1.10 0.944 48.2% — — +332 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — +0.47
33 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25 2023 1569 105.0 -1.38 +0.08 0.816 46.0% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–1 — -0.05
34 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04 — 1922 140.4 +2.23 +1.19 1.059 51.1% -33 -94 +169 55.9% +0.44 57–72 (44%) 48–43 (53%) 98.5 -1.28

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.