H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Priscilla Hon vs Richel Hogenkamp H2H: 0-1
Richel Hogenkamp holds a 1–0 lead over Priscilla Hon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Richel Hogenkamp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richel Hogenkamp won the 2017 Seoul quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2017* | Seoul | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Richel Hogenkamp | 6-3 6-4 | Priscilla Hon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priscilla Hon | #161 | #101 | 748 | 1,684 | 17 | 40 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richel Hogenkamp | #1,297 | #94 | 654 | 1,579 | 14 | 28 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Priscilla Hon | Richel Hogenkamp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #124 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #213 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #148 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #132 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #154 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #106 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #119 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |