H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Alycia Parks H2H: 2-1
Qinwen Zheng holds a 2–1 lead over Alycia Parks in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on clay, while Alycia Parks leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2026 Doha third round 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2026 | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-2 | Alycia Parks | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2023* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Qinwen Zheng | 6-4 6-4 | Alycia Parks | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2022* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Alycia Parks | 6-3 7-6(4) | Qinwen Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Alycia Parks | #70 | #40 | 1,208 | 1,817 | 51 | 76 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Alycia Parks | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #82 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #78 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |