H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qinwen Zheng vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 0-1

Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Qinwen Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2025 Australian Open second round 7-6(3) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qinwen Zheng
China Age 23 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #97 7-6(3) 6-3 Qinwen Zheng #5 Match data Jan 15, 2025 R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qinwen Zheng #121 #4 5,340 2,105 141 82 63.2% 0 1 0 0 2 2 5
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qinwen Zheng Laura Siegemund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2021 1–3 25.0% #126 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2022 22–17 56.4% #28 1,829 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2023 35–20 63.6% #15 1,964 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 2024 48–17 73.8% #5 2,089 0 5 — — — — — — —
22 2025 20–12 62.5% #24 2,005 0 5 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0
23 2026 15–13 53.6% #121 1,925 0 5 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2
38 — — — — — — — 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qinwen Zheng Laura Siegemund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 16 11 27 59.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 24 13 37 64.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 30 11 41 73.2% 17 4 21 81.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 8 6 14 57.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2026 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 88 49 137 64.2% 46 19 65 70.8% 7 14 21 33.3% — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 206/223 of Qinwen Zheng's and 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qinwen Zheng Laura Siegemund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2021 4/4 4.0 6.0 44.2% 76.6% 41.4% 64.5% 49.6% 56.8% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 37/39 6.8 5.7 52.2% 76.1% 45.3% 61.3% 43.8% 61.5% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 52/55 6.6 4.2 51.4% 74.7% 45.7% 59.8% 48.0% 60.6% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 59/65 6.7 3.6 52.9% 76.9% 47.4% 57.6% 49.0% 63.0% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 26/32 4.5 3.8 55.3% 70.7% 46.4% 49.9% 55.0% 59.9% 45.6% 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5%
23 2026 28/28 8.2 4.7 52.8% 74.5% 47.8% 56.6% 46.6% 61.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3%
Career — 206/223 6.6 4.3 52.5% 75.1% 46.4% 57.8% 48.2% 61.5% 42.9% — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qinwen Zheng Laura Siegemund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2019 1493 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2021 1560 120.6 +0.23 -1.61 0.799 46.5% — — — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2022 1830 148.1 +4.12 +1.19 1.114 52.1% -26 -69 -222 52.9% +0.10 9–8 (53%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2023 1965 158.6 +3.42 +1.11 1.104 51.9% +22 -50 -426 59.4% +0.73 16–6 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 110.5 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2024 2090 165.0 +5.64 +2.11 1.193 53.3% +1 +11 -537 66.0% +1.35 19–5 (79%) 7–7 (50%) 108.7 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2025 2006 154.2 +2.79 +2.67 1.138 52.7% +23 +110 -458 62.5% +0.82 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 96.8 -0.14 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13
23 2026 1926 146.7 +3.33 -2.30 1.002 49.9% +102 +128 -369 50.0% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1749 131.9 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.21
Career — 2106 160.3 +4.03 +1.09 1.114 52.1% +16 +21 -383 58.8% +0.69 57–30 (66%) 31–23 (57%) 113.3 -1.23 — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.