H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Qinwen Zheng vs Paula Badosa H2H: 1-0
Qinwen Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Paula Badosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qinwen Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qinwen Zheng won the 2022 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Age 23
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2022* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Qinwen Zheng | 6-3 6-2 | Paula Badosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qinwen Zheng | #135 | #5 | 5,340 | 2,075 | 131 | 79 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Qinwen Zheng | Paula Badosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #28 | 1,829 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #15 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #5 | 2,060 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,996 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,882 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 |