H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Aleksandra Krunic
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rebecca Marino vs Aleksandra Krunic.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aleksandra Krunic | #470 | #39 | 1,210 | 1,771 | 86 | 117 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Aleksandra Krunic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #87 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #108 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #144 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #54 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #55 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #163 | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #286 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |