H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1

Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2022 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Marino #90 4-6 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Camila Giorgi #51 Match data Aug 12, 2023 Q1 Q Cincinnati Open WTA 1000 Hard
Camila Giorgi #26 7-5 6-4 Rebecca Marino #107 Match data Jun 23, 2022* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 500 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Camila Giorgi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Camila Giorgi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Camila Giorgi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5%
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4%
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7%
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6%
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5%
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1%
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4%
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Camila Giorgi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.