H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Pan Pacific Open round of 64 1-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #34 1-6 6-2 7-5 Rebecca Marino #55 Match data Sep 28, 2011* R64 Pan Pacific Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Jarmila Wolfe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Jarmila Wolfe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.