H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-0

Rebecca Marino holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2008 Quebec City round of 32 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rebecca Marino #471 7-6(4) 6-1 Jill Craybas #65 Match data Oct 30, 2008* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.