H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Junri Namigata H2H: 1-0
Rebecca Marino holds a 1–0 lead over Junri Namigata in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2011 Australian Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 44
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Junri Namigata | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Junri Namigata | #1,159 | #105 | 641 | 1,519 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Junri Namigata | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |