H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez H2H: 1-0
Rebecca Marino holds a 1–0 lead over Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2011 Roland Garros second round 2-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Rebecca Marino | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | #761 | #19 | 2,635 | 1,891 | 105 | 99 | 51.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #93 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,804 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #35 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #162 | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #555 | 1,678 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |