H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 1-1
Rebecca Marino and Marion Bartoli are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Stanford fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 6-4 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Sep 17, 2010* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-3 6-1 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |