H2H data updated: 2026-11-05 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1

Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2011 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michaella Krajicek #138 6-1 6-3 Rebecca Marino #50 Match data Sep 17, 2011* QF Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino — #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michaella Krajicek — #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,502 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,503 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,673 0 3
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,551 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,538 0 3
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,562 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,539 0 3
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,531 0 0 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,508 0 3
22 2013 0–1 0.0% — 1,523 0 0 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,590 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,563 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,546 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,562 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,621 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% — 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.8% 40.9% 58.3% 37.5% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 51.1% 45.6% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 2008 1502 100.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.21 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 2007 1674 134.7 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -38 +107 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.44
19 2010 1551 122.0 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +28 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2008 1538 99.5 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +19 -25 +205 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.7 +0.72
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +11 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.65 2009 1539 115.0 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +23 — +166 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.23
21 2012 1531 101.1 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2010 1508 96.4 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +33 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2011 1591 120.3 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +34 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.99
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1563 112.2 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +62 -55 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.18
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1537 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +54 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.29
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2018 1548 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -23 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1530 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1586 118.4 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1678 109.8 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1622 115.9 -1.69 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -29 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1605 104.4 +1.26 -1.56 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08 2024 1503 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.5 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -10 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1803 124.7 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -85 +78 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.