H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1
Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2011 Quebec City quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2011* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Michaella Krajicek | 6-1 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michaella Krajicek | #1,134 | #30 | 918 | 1,803 | 89 | 98 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Michaella Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #35 | 1,754 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #33 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #203 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,589 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #167 | 1,562 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #282 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,549 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |