H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Rebeka Masarova vs Annika Beck H2H: 1-1
Rebeka Masarova and Annika Beck are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rebeka Masarova leads 1–0 on clay, while Annika Beck leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2017 Biel third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017* | Biel | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Annika Beck | 6-4 6-4 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2016* | Gstaad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rebeka Masarova | 7-5 6-2 | Annika Beck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Annika Beck | #903 | #37 | 1,455 | 1,746 | 91 | 114 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Annika Beck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #51 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #178 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |