H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Rebeka Masarova vs Sara Errani
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rebeka Masarova vs Sara Errani.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Sara Errani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 |