H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Zarazua vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 0-2
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Zarazua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna Karolina Schmiedlova won the 2021 Guadalajara fourth round 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MEX
Age 28
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2021* | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2018* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-1 6-4 | Renata Zarazua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Zarazua | #83 | #51 | 1,063 | 1,746 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Zarazua | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #257 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #263 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #135 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #368 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #104 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #79 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #83 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |