H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 1-6

Jelena Jankovic holds a 6–1 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 5–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2016 Guangzhou quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

GER Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 6
7 main draw meetings
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 23, 2016* Guangzhou WTA 250 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #37 7-6(4) 6-4 Sabine Lisicki #113 Match data
Mar 14, 2015* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Jelena Jankovic #21 3-6 6-3 6-1 Sabine Lisicki #30 Match data
Aug 14, 2013* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jelena Jankovic #15 7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 Sabine Lisicki #18 Match data
Apr 26, 2013* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Sabine Lisicki #47 7-6(3) 7-5 Jelena Jankovic #18 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #8 6-3 4-6 6-2 Sabine Lisicki #26 Match data
Jul 31, 2009* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #6 2-6 6-2 6-4 Sabine Lisicki #25 Match data
May 1, 2009* Stuttgart WTA 500 R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 7-5 5-7 6-3 Sabine Lisicki #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,940 206 172 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Jelena Jankovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,606 0 0 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,792 0 1 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,658 0 1 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,872 0 3 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
22 2012 15–18 45.5% #37 1,707 0 3 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,824 0 3 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,798 0 4 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,791 0 4 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12
26 2016 14–19 42.4% #93 1,647 0 4 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12
27 2017 3–4 42.9% #220 1,636 0 4 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,549 0 4 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,479 0 4 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,575 0 4 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,569 0 4