H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Monica Puig H2H: 2-0
Sabine Lisicki holds a 2–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Lisicki leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2016 Madrid second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2016 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sabine Lisicki | 6-1 6-3 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sabine Lisicki | 6-3 6-2 | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Lisicki | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |