H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Naomi Broady H2H: 0-2

Naomi Broady holds a 2–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Broady leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Broady won the 2017 Luxembourg second round 4-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Lisicki
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Naomi Broady
Great Britain Age 36 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Broady #129 4-6 7-5 6-3 Sabine Lisicki #262 Match data Oct 19, 2017* R16 Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Naomi Broady #96 7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 Sabine Lisicki #31 Match data Mar 5, 2016* QF Kuala Lumpur International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,921 211 176 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Naomi Broady #1,209 #76 875 1,604 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Naomi Broady
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,794 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #298 1,484 0 0
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,659 0 1 2010 0–1 0.0% #287 1,469 0 0
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,878 0 3 2011 1–2 33.3% #196 1,472 0 0
22 2012 17–19 47.2% #37 1,720 0 3 2012 0–1 0.0% #287 1,463 0 0
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,844 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,818 0 4 2014 1–3 25.0% #170 1,459 0 0
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,795 0 4 2015 5–5 50.0% #121 1,511 0 0
26 2016 15–21 41.7% #93 1,639 0 4 2016 10–15 40.0% #91 1,495 0 0
27 2017 5–5 50.0% #220 1,633 0 4 2017 6–11 35.3% #117 1,551 0 0
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,547 0 4 2018 1–3 25.0% #250 1,485 0 0
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,478 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,574 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabine Lisicki Naomi Broady
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 14 13 27 51.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 15 11 26 57.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 19 9 28 67.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 2011 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2012 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 18 11 29 62.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 2017 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2018 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 113 241 53.1% 38 43 81 46.9% 45 20 65 69.2% — 20 22 42 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 18 22 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's and 59/66 of Naomi Broady's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sabine Lisicki Naomi Broady
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 1/1 3.0 8.0 49.4% 65.8% 35.9% 45.5% 33.3% 50.6% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 49.0% 48.0% 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 47.1% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 27/34 4.6 7.2 56.7% 68.5% 38.4% 52.4% 54.9% 55.4% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 41/46 4.9 6.3 54.0% 70.6% 44.5% 47.2% 52.2% 58.6% 44.7% 2009 1/1 15.0 3.0 57.6% 70.6% 42.0% 61.5% 33.3% 58.5% 40.0%
20 2010 13/13 4.5 5.5 52.1% 66.4% 47.9% 56.4% 41.1% 57.5% 44.1% 2010 1/1 8.0 2.0 56.5% 74.4% 33.3% 50.0% 28.6% 56.5% 35.7%
21 2011 44/48 5.4 4.0 54.1% 74.3% 49.2% 62.2% 50.3% 62.9% 47.5% 2011 3/3 12.7 4.3 54.0% 75.3% 48.4% 69.0% 15.8% 63.3% 34.5%
22 2012 29/36 4.6 5.3 56.4% 65.4% 43.5% 48.7% 49.9% 55.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2013 51/53 5.7 3.7 55.8% 71.5% 47.1% 57.6% 46.8% 60.6% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 44/48 5.3 6.0 56.2% 66.5% 42.2% 53.2% 52.3% 55.9% 44.9% 2014 4/4 9.3 4.3 56.9% 70.8% 43.8% 46.7% 42.1% 59.1% 29.0%
25 2015 38/41 6.1 5.5 61.7% 68.6% 49.6% 51.9% 45.5% 61.2% 41.8% 2015 6/10 10.3 3.3 63.4% 78.6% 45.8% 46.4% 27.9% 66.7% 32.4%
26 2016 30/36 4.1 5.1 56.7% 65.7% 45.0% 54.8% 50.2% 57.0% 42.3% 2016 23/26 8.4 4.8 57.9% 70.2% 39.9% 50.5% 38.0% 57.4% 36.1%
27 2017 7/10 5.0 5.3 57.0% 65.3% 43.1% 49.3% 44.1% 55.9% 38.7% 2017 17/17 9.6 4.1 57.9% 74.7% 44.9% 49.7% 46.1% 62.0% 33.3%
28 2018 9/9 4.7 6.8 53.8% 66.4% 38.0% 51.6% 47.3% 53.6% 44.3% 2018 4/4 12.5 3.5 58.4% 64.4% 50.3% 64.0% 10.0% 58.8% 30.1%
29 2019 4/4 7.0 5.0 50.7% 68.5% 43.6% 35.5% 31.3% 56.1% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 4/4 6.0 6.0 55.5% 72.1% 44.7% 61.8% 20.8% 59.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 3/3 9.0 7.3 50.8% 69.6% 47.4% 64.9% 17.8% 57.6% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 346/387 5.2 5.3 56.0% 69.0% 45.2% 53.8% 48.5% 58.5% 44.0% — 59/67 9.6 4.2 58.2% 72.3% 43.3% 51.6% 36.3% 60.2% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabine Lisicki Naomi Broady
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2006 1490 97.8 -4.35 +1.90 0.851 46.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 1475 92.7 -4.39 -4.73 0.575 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1609 133.9 +0.46 +1.65 1.031 50.7% +18 -91 — 48.8% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.3 -0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1795 142.8 +2.82 +1.50 1.080 51.5% -77 -94 -115 67.0% +1.00 5–9 (36%) 8–5 (62%) 101.1 -1.35 2009 1485 100.3 -1.38 -3.59 0.963 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
20 2010 1660 119.1 +0.56 +0.05 1.039 50.7% -50 — — 39.1% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.00 2010 1470 99.4 -5.23 -2.65 0.821 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
21 2011 1878 150.7 +6.12 +3.41 1.281 54.9% -103 -151 +55 71.6% +1.55 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 -1.88 2011 1473 95.0 +1.81 -0.83 0.939 48.5% — — +46 37.5% -0.62 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
22 2012 1720 130.9 +0.96 +0.55 0.960 49.3% -29 -44 +213 50.0% -0.14 9–9 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.1 -0.58 2012 1463 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.04
23 2013 1844 146.6 +4.46 +1.57 1.140 52.5% -62 -114 +222 64.1% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.7 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2014 1818 138.6 +0.60 +1.87 1.017 50.4% -31 -117 +227 56.5% +0.41 13–7 (65%) 3–5 (38%) 102.1 -0.86 2014 1460 101.3 -0.21 -3.52 0.709 45.2% — — +50 30.0% -1.10 1–1 1–0 — +0.03
25 2015 1795 140.5 +2.78 +0.69 1.077 51.3% +8 -130 +203 55.2% +0.35 5–11 (31%) 9–9 (50%) 94.4 -0.18 2015 1511 105.2 +3.12 -3.00 0.975 48.6% +44 — -16 47.8% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.53
26 2016 1640 122.1 +0.47 -0.96 0.982 49.4% +15 -29 +307 46.3% -0.07 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 85.1 +0.16 2016 1495 109.2 +0.76 -4.87 0.847 47.1% +47 — -85 41.0% -0.85 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 100.2 -0.37
27 2017 1634 104.3 -1.13 -0.41 0.878 47.6% +5 — +286 50.0% -0.55 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.0 +0.09 2017 1551 114.6 +2.49 -5.32 0.876 47.9% +6 — -166 42.9% -0.71 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 99.1 -0.22
28 2018 1547 109.2 -1.76 -0.60 0.954 48.7% +1 — — 47.6% -0.28 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.66 2018 1485 104.1 +0.54 -1.89 0.732 44.6% +4 — — 30.0% -1.40 1–1 1–1 — -0.19
29 2019 1478 99.2 +1.15 -1.10 0.795 44.9% — +20 — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — -0.75 2019 1445 88.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1519 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1434 96.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1575 103.5 -0.52 -1.10 0.944 48.2% — — +332 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1569 105.0 -1.38 +0.08 0.816 46.0% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1922 140.4 +2.23 +1.19 1.059 51.1% -33 -94 +169 55.9% +0.44 57–72 (44%) 48–43 (53%) 98.5 -1.28 — 1604 108.0 +1.33 -4.25 0.854 47.3% +30 — -43 39.8% -0.76 13–16 (45%) 11–13 (46%) 99.4 -0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.