H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-0
Sabine Lisicki holds a 1–0 lead over Sílvia Soler-Espinosa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2015 Nuremberg third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2015* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Lisicki | 6-4 7-5 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabine Lisicki | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |