H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Vania King H2H: 1-0

Sabine Lisicki holds a 1–0 lead over Vania King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2014 Charleston Open round of 32 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sabine Lisicki
Germany Age 37 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Vania King
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabine Lisicki #15 7-5 4-6 6-3 Vania King #72 Match data Apr 3, 2014* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabine Lisicki — #12 3,251 1,922 211 176 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,608 0 0 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,794 0 1 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,659 0 1 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,878 0 3 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1
22 2012 17–19 47.2% #37 1,720 0 3 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,844 0 3 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,818 0 4 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,795 0 4 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2016 15–21 41.7% #93 1,639 0 4 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2017 5–5 50.0% #220 1,633 0 4 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,547 0 4 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,478 0 4 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,574 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabine Lisicki Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2008 14 13 27 51.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2009 15 11 26 57.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2010 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2011 19 9 28 67.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 1 12 91.7% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 18 11 29 62.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2017 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2018 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128 113 241 53.1% 38 43 81 46.9% 45 20 65 69.2% — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 346/387 of Sabine Lisicki's and 237/289 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sabine Lisicki Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2006 1/1 3.0 8.0 49.4% 65.8% 35.9% 45.5% 33.3% 50.6% 42.0% 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 49.0% 48.0% 46.2% 50.0% 0.0% 47.1% 30.4% 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2008 27/34 4.6 7.2 56.7% 68.5% 38.4% 52.4% 54.9% 55.4% 46.0% 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2009 41/46 4.9 6.3 54.0% 70.6% 44.5% 47.2% 52.2% 58.6% 44.7% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2010 13/13 4.5 5.5 52.1% 66.4% 47.9% 56.4% 41.1% 57.5% 44.1% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2011 44/48 5.4 4.0 54.1% 74.3% 49.2% 62.2% 50.3% 62.9% 47.5% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2012 29/36 4.6 5.3 56.4% 65.4% 43.5% 48.7% 49.9% 55.8% 42.5% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2013 51/53 5.7 3.7 55.8% 71.5% 47.1% 57.6% 46.8% 60.6% 44.9% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2014 44/48 5.3 6.0 56.2% 66.5% 42.2% 53.2% 52.3% 55.9% 44.9% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2015 38/41 6.1 5.5 61.7% 68.6% 49.6% 51.9% 45.5% 61.2% 41.8% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2016 30/36 4.1 5.1 56.7% 65.7% 45.0% 54.8% 50.2% 57.0% 42.3% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2017 7/10 5.0 5.3 57.0% 65.3% 43.1% 49.3% 44.1% 55.9% 38.7% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2018 9/9 4.7 6.8 53.8% 66.4% 38.0% 51.6% 47.3% 53.6% 44.3% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2019 4/4 7.0 5.0 50.7% 68.5% 43.6% 35.5% 31.3% 56.1% 34.9% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
32 2022 4/4 6.0 6.0 55.5% 72.1% 44.7% 61.8% 20.8% 59.9% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 3/3 9.0 7.3 50.8% 69.6% 47.4% 64.9% 17.8% 57.6% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 346/387 5.2 5.3 56.0% 69.0% 45.2% 53.8% 48.4% 58.5% 44.0% — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabine Lisicki Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2006 1490 97.8 -4.35 +1.90 0.851 46.2% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — 0.00 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2007 1475 92.7 -4.39 -4.73 0.575 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2008 1609 134.0 +0.46 +1.65 1.031 50.7% +16 -91 — 48.8% +0.23 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 99.4 -0.69 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51
19 2009 1795 142.8 +2.82 +1.50 1.080 51.5% -77 -94 -114 67.0% +1.00 5–9 (36%) 8–5 (62%) 101.1 -1.31 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10
20 2010 1660 119.1 +0.56 +0.05 1.039 50.7% -50 — — 39.1% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +1.00 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35
21 2011 1879 150.7 +6.12 +3.41 1.281 54.9% -104 -152 +55 71.6% +1.55 5–4 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 -1.88 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40
22 2012 1721 130.9 +0.96 +0.55 0.960 49.3% -29 -45 +212 50.0% -0.14 9–9 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.1 -0.58 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2013 1844 146.6 +4.46 +1.57 1.140 52.5% -62 -114 +223 64.1% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 102.7 -1.08 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2014 1818 138.7 +0.60 +1.87 1.017 50.4% -31 -117 +228 56.5% +0.41 13–7 (65%) 3–5 (38%) 102.1 -0.86 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2015 1795 140.5 +2.78 +0.69 1.077 51.3% +10 -130 +203 55.2% +0.35 5–11 (31%) 9–9 (50%) 94.4 -0.18 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2016 1640 122.4 +0.47 -0.96 0.982 49.4% +15 -29 +308 45.6% -0.15 1–8 (11%) 1–7 (13%) 85.1 +0.16 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2017 1634 104.4 -1.13 -0.41 0.878 47.6% +5 — +286 50.0% -0.55 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.0 +0.10 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2018 1547 109.2 -1.76 -0.60 0.954 48.7% +1 — — 47.6% -0.28 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.66 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2019 1479 99.2 +1.16 -1.11 0.795 44.9% — +19 — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 — — -0.75 2018 1560 108.6 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2020 1519 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1575 103.5 -0.52 -1.10 0.944 48.2% — — +332 44.4% -0.44 1–0 1–1 — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1569 105.0 -1.38 +0.08 0.816 46.0% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 0–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1922 140.6 +2.23 +1.19 1.059 51.1% -33 -95 +170 55.9% +0.43 57–72 (44%) 48–43 (53%) 98.6 -1.27 — 1768 128.4 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.