H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Sabine Lisicki vs Venus Williams H2H: 4-1

Sabine Lisicki holds a 4–1 lead over Venus Williams in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sabine Lisicki leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2015 Toronto second round 6-0 6-3.

GER Age 36 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Sabine Lisicki #24 6-0 6-3 Venus Williams #22 Match data
Oct 3, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Sabine Lisicki #16 6-1 6-2 Venus Williams #38 Match data
Sep 1, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Sabine Lisicki #18 (w/o) Venus Williams #36 Match data
Feb 18, 2010* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #5 6-2 6-3 Sabine Lisicki #25 Match data
Apr 17, 2009* Charleston WTA 500 R16 Clay Sabine Lisicki #63 6-4 7-6(5) Venus Williams #5 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sabine Lisicki #502 #12 3,251 1,940 206 172 54.5% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabine Lisicki Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
15 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2006 0–1 0.0% #444 1,489 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #198 1,475 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2008 16–18 47.1% #57 1,606 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2009 29–17 63.0% #22 1,792 0 1 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2010 4–9 30.8% #175 1,658 0 1 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2011 35–13 72.9% #15 1,872 0 3 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2012 15–18 45.5% #37 1,707 0 3 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2013 34–19 64.2% #15 1,824 0 3 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2014 27–21 56.2% #26 1,798 0 4 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2015 22–19 53.7% #32 1,791 0 4 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2016 14–19 42.4% #93 1,647 0 4 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2017 3–4 42.9% #220 1,636 0 4 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2018 5–4 55.6% #199 1,549 0 4 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2019 0–4 0.0% #562 1,479 0 4 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2022 2–2 50.0% #342 1,575 0 4 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2023 0–3 0.0% #311 1,569 0 4 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47