H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabine Lisicki vs Yung Jan Chan H2H: 1-0
Sabine Lisicki holds a 1–0 lead over Yung Jan Chan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabine Lisicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Lisicki won the 2010 Dubai second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2010* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sabine Lisicki | 6-1 6-4 | Yung Jan Chan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Yung Jan Chan | — | — | — | 1,640 | 49 | 83 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sabine Lisicki | Yung Jan Chan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |