H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Sachia Vickery vs Lara Arruabarrena H2H: 0-1
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Sachia Vickery in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2016 Bogota quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2016* | Bogota | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lara Arruabarrena | 6-2 6-0 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Lara Arruabarrena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |