H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Saisai Zheng vs Camila Giorgi H2H: 0-1

Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2017 Shenzhen second round 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Saisai Zheng
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #81 6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 Saisai Zheng #84 Match data Jan 5, 2017* R16 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Saisai Zheng #692 #34 1,585 1,776 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Saisai Zheng Camila Giorgi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–2 0.0% #276 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–3 40.0% #138 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0
20 2014 6–6 50.0% #100 1,552 0 0 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0
21 2015 9–22 29.0% #72 1,495 0 0 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0
22 2016 13–24 35.1% #85 1,542 0 0 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0
23 2017 5–10 33.3% #93 1,618 0 0 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1
24 2018 13–12 52.0% #38 1,678 0 0 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1
25 2019 21–23 47.7% #42 1,750 0 1 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1
26 2020 6–4 60.0% #41 1,768 0 1 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2
27 2021 10–17 37.0% #79 1,686 0 1 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3
30 2024 1–5 16.7% #692 1,548 0 1 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3
31 2025 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 1 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Saisai Zheng Camila Giorgi
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2015 8 17 25 32.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2016 10 17 27 37.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2017 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
24 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2020 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 2024 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 75 100 175 42.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's and 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Saisai Zheng Camila Giorgi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 57.0% 46.2% 38.1% 48.6% 17.7% 43.0% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 5/5 0.8 1.2 59.6% 59.8% 41.1% 51.6% 46.4% 52.1% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 4/4 1.8 3.8 63.2% 56.7% 39.1% 50.4% 42.0% 50.4% 45.6% 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5%
20 2014 8/12 1.6 1.4 66.9% 56.0% 51.5% 45.6% 52.8% 54.4% 45.8% 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4%
21 2015 20/31 0.9 2.2 66.6% 52.7% 45.0% 41.5% 52.4% 50.4% 40.2% 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7%
22 2016 34/37 0.9 2.1 63.7% 56.5% 46.6% 51.9% 45.9% 52.5% 44.2% 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8%
23 2017 15/15 1.2 2.2 65.3% 54.2% 43.1% 51.6% 58.7% 49.8% 38.9% 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9%
24 2018 21/25 0.9 2.0 66.8% 58.5% 45.1% 54.0% 49.2% 54.0% 45.2% 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1%
25 2019 44/44 1.4 2.7 64.7% 59.2% 44.3% 49.7% 45.7% 53.7% 43.6% 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1%
26 2020 10/10 1.3 2.0 70.3% 62.9% 43.1% 43.5% 45.9% 57.5% 46.4% 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6%
27 2021 26/27 0.9 1.8 67.3% 58.4% 47.9% 53.1% 43.0% 54.9% 42.5% 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1%
30 2024 6/6 1.0 3.3 62.2% 51.9% 44.6% 40.1% 45.4% 49.1% 39.6% 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4%
Career — 195/220 1.1 2.2 65.4% 57.2% 45.2% 49.6% 47.4% 52.9% 43.1% — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Saisai Zheng Camila Giorgi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1474 95.9 -1.89 -2.23 0.676 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1483 99.4 -0.72 -1.45 0.900 48.2% +11 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1468 100.9 -1.08 +0.55 0.920 48.0% +5 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
20 2014 1553 119.6 -1.26 +0.86 1.006 49.7% +9 — — 53.3% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.37 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04
21 2015 1496 110.7 -5.38 -1.24 0.811 45.6% +9 +30 +74 30.9% -1.50 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -0.08 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04
22 2016 1542 123.0 -2.10 +1.09 0.930 48.2% +24 -74 +9 40.0% -0.83 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.8 +0.81 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57
23 2017 1619 110.1 -3.22 -1.56 0.775 44.5% -8 -100 — 34.2% -1.42 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.08 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69
24 2018 1679 118.9 -1.21 +1.53 0.983 49.6% +22 -169 -79 54.5% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +1.42 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53
25 2019 1750 134.4 -2.18 +0.80 0.942 48.7% -10 -123 -200 48.0% -0.28 8–6 (57%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 +0.31 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25
26 2020 1768 132.2 +0.85 +2.96 1.090 51.7% -8 — — 58.3% +0.58 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.03 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86
27 2021 1686 121.1 -1.18 -0.16 0.941 48.6% -18 -68 — 38.7% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.36 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02
30 2024 1548 93.3 -2.71 -2.47 0.779 44.6% -4 — — 26.7% -1.73 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.51 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10
31 2025 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.05 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16
Career — 1777 123.8 -2.10 +0.33 0.915 48.0% +3 -88 -35 41.7% -0.74 31–38 (45%) 23–16 (59%) 104.4 +1.33 — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.