H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2015 Tokyo fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2015* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 6-2 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |