H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 1-2
Jelena Jankovic holds a 2–1 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2015 Strasbourg fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2015* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-0 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2014* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-3 6-3 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Jelena Jankovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 |