H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Lucie Hradecka H2H: 0-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 6-0 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Lucie Hradecka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |