H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 0-1
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2014 US Open second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Lucie Safarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 |