H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Saisai Zheng vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |