H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 0-1
Pauline Parmentier holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2019 Shenzhen third round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 40
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2019* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2016 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q4 | Hard | Pauline Parmentier | 6-2 7-6(2) | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Pauline Parmentier | #346 | #40 | 1,121 | 1,702 | 121 | 188 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Pauline Parmentier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #57 | 1,612 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #61 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #105 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #74 | 1,441 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #65 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #229 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #120 | 1,460 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #70 | 1,580 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #79 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #56 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #123 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |