H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Saisai Zheng vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 0-1

Pauline Parmentier holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pauline Parmentier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pauline Parmentier won the 2019 Shenzhen round of 32 6-2 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Saisai Zheng
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pauline Parmentier #56 6-2 3-6 6-2 Saisai Zheng #38 Match data Jan 3, 2019* R32 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Pauline Parmentier #116 6-2 7-6(2) Saisai Zheng #65 Match data Mar 8, 2016 Q4 Q Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Saisai Zheng #692 #34 1,585 1,776 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Saisai Zheng Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–2 0.0% #276 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 2–3 40.0% #138 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0
20 2014 6–6 50.0% #100 1,552 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2015 9–22 29.0% #72 1,495 0 0 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2016 13–24 35.1% #85 1,542 0 0 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2
23 2017 5–10 33.3% #93 1,618 0 0 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2
24 2018 13–12 52.0% #38 1,678 0 0 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2
25 2019 21–23 47.7% #42 1,750 0 1 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2
26 2020 6–4 60.0% #41 1,768 0 1 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 2021 10–17 37.0% #79 1,686 0 1 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2
30 2024 1–5 16.7% #692 1,548 0 1 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2
31 2025 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 1 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Saisai Zheng Pauline Parmentier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 8 17 25 32.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 10 17 27 37.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2017 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2020 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2024 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 75 100 175 42.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — — — — — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's and 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Saisai Zheng Pauline Parmentier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 57.0% 46.2% 38.1% 48.6% 17.7% 43.0% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 5/5 0.8 1.2 59.6% 59.8% 41.1% 51.6% 46.4% 52.1% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 4/4 1.8 3.8 63.2% 56.7% 39.1% 50.4% 42.0% 50.4% 45.6% 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8%
20 2014 8/12 1.6 1.4 66.9% 56.0% 51.5% 45.6% 52.8% 54.4% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2015 20/31 0.9 2.2 66.6% 52.7% 45.0% 41.5% 52.4% 50.4% 40.2% 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4%
22 2016 34/37 0.9 2.1 63.7% 56.5% 46.6% 51.9% 45.9% 52.5% 44.2% 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6%
23 2017 15/15 1.2 2.2 65.3% 54.2% 43.1% 51.6% 58.7% 49.8% 38.9% 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8%
24 2018 21/25 0.9 2.0 66.8% 58.5% 45.1% 54.0% 49.2% 54.0% 45.2% 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2%
25 2019 44/44 1.4 2.7 64.7% 59.2% 44.3% 49.7% 45.7% 53.7% 43.6% 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2%
26 2020 10/10 1.3 2.0 70.3% 62.9% 43.1% 43.5% 45.9% 57.5% 46.4% 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7%
27 2021 26/27 0.9 1.8 67.3% 58.4% 47.9% 53.1% 43.0% 54.9% 42.5% 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3%
30 2024 6/6 1.0 3.3 62.2% 51.9% 44.6% 40.1% 45.4% 49.1% 39.6% 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0%
Career — 195/220 1.1 2.2 65.4% 57.2% 45.2% 49.6% 47.4% 52.9% 43.1% — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Saisai Zheng Pauline Parmentier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1474 95.9 -1.89 -2.23 0.676 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1483 99.4 -0.72 -1.45 0.900 48.2% +11 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–0 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1468 100.9 -1.08 +0.55 0.920 48.0% +5 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04
20 2014 1553 119.6 -1.26 +0.86 1.006 49.7% +9 — — 53.3% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.37 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10
21 2015 1496 110.7 -5.38 -1.24 0.811 45.6% +9 +30 +74 30.9% -1.50 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -0.08 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74
22 2016 1542 123.0 -2.10 +1.09 0.930 48.2% +24 -74 +9 40.0% -0.83 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.8 +0.81 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83
23 2017 1619 110.1 -3.22 -1.56 0.775 44.5% -8 -100 — 34.2% -1.42 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.08 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22
24 2018 1679 118.9 -1.21 +1.53 0.983 49.6% +22 -169 -79 54.5% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +1.42 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96
25 2019 1750 134.4 -2.18 +0.80 0.942 48.7% -10 -123 -200 48.0% -0.28 8–6 (57%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 +0.31 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55
26 2020 1768 132.2 +0.85 +2.96 1.090 51.7% -8 — — 58.3% +0.58 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.03 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14
27 2021 1686 121.1 -1.18 -0.16 0.941 48.6% -18 -68 — 38.7% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.36 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21
30 2024 1548 93.3 -2.71 -2.47 0.779 44.6% -4 — — 26.7% -1.73 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.51 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66
31 2025 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.05 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38
Career — 1777 123.8 -2.10 +0.33 0.915 48.0% +3 -88 -35 41.7% -0.74 31–38 (45%) 23–16 (59%) 104.4 +1.33 — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.