H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Saisai Zheng vs Timea Babos H2H: 2-0

Saisai Zheng holds a 2–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Saisai Zheng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 Acapulco second round 4-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Saisai Zheng
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Saisai Zheng #40 4-6 6-4 6-3 Timea Babos #110 Match data Feb 27, 2019 R16 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Saisai Zheng #112 7-5 6-4 Timea Babos #108 Match data Oct 9, 2014* R32 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Saisai Zheng #692 #34 1,585 1,776 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Saisai Zheng Timea Babos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 0–2 0.0% #276 1,473 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0
18 2012 2–3 40.0% #138 1,483 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1
20 2014 6–6 50.0% #100 1,552 0 0 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1
21 2015 9–22 29.0% #72 1,495 0 0 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1
22 2016 13–24 35.1% #85 1,542 0 0 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1
23 2017 5–10 33.3% #93 1,618 0 0 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1
24 2018 13–12 52.0% #38 1,678 0 0 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2
25 2019 21–23 47.7% #42 1,750 0 1 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3
26 2020 6–4 60.0% #41 1,768 0 1 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3
27 2021 10–17 37.0% #79 1,686 0 1 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3
30 2024 1–5 16.7% #692 1,548 0 1 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3
31 2025 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 1 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Saisai Zheng Timea Babos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2013 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2015 8 17 25 32.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2016 10 17 27 37.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2017 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2020 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2024 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 75 100 175 42.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's and 283/304 of Timea Babos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Saisai Zheng Timea Babos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 57.0% 46.2% 38.1% 48.6% 17.7% 43.0% 38.5% 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3%
18 2012 5/5 0.8 1.2 59.6% 59.8% 41.1% 51.6% 46.4% 52.1% 43.1% 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0%
19 2013 4/4 1.8 3.8 63.2% 56.7% 39.1% 50.4% 42.0% 50.4% 45.6% 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9%
20 2014 8/12 1.6 1.4 66.9% 56.0% 51.5% 45.6% 52.8% 54.4% 45.8% 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3%
21 2015 20/31 0.9 2.2 66.6% 52.7% 45.0% 41.5% 52.4% 50.4% 40.2% 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9%
22 2016 34/37 0.9 2.1 63.7% 56.5% 46.6% 51.9% 45.9% 52.5% 44.2% 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1%
23 2017 15/15 1.2 2.2 65.3% 54.2% 43.1% 51.6% 58.7% 49.8% 38.9% 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2%
24 2018 21/25 0.9 2.0 66.8% 58.5% 45.1% 54.0% 49.2% 54.0% 45.2% 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0%
25 2019 44/44 1.4 2.7 64.7% 59.2% 44.3% 49.7% 45.7% 53.7% 43.6% 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8%
26 2020 10/10 1.3 2.0 70.3% 62.9% 43.1% 43.5% 45.9% 57.5% 46.4% 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9%
27 2021 26/27 0.9 1.8 67.3% 58.4% 47.9% 53.1% 43.0% 54.9% 42.5% 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6%
30 2024 6/6 1.0 3.3 62.2% 51.9% 44.6% 40.1% 45.4% 49.1% 39.6% 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4%
Career — 195/220 1.1 2.2 65.4% 57.2% 45.2% 49.6% 47.4% 52.9% 43.1% — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Saisai Zheng Timea Babos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1474 95.9 -1.89 -2.23 0.676 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.25 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
18 2012 1483 99.4 -0.72 -1.45 0.900 48.2% +11 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–0 — +0.37 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
19 2013 1468 100.9 -1.08 +0.55 0.920 48.0% +5 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38
20 2014 1553 119.6 -1.26 +0.86 1.006 49.7% +9 — — 53.3% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.37 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12
21 2015 1496 110.7 -5.38 -1.24 0.811 45.6% +9 +30 +74 30.9% -1.50 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -0.08 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74
22 2016 1542 123.0 -2.10 +1.09 0.930 48.2% +24 -74 +9 40.0% -0.83 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.8 +0.81 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03
23 2017 1619 110.1 -3.22 -1.56 0.775 44.5% -8 -100 — 34.2% -1.42 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.08 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26
24 2018 1679 118.9 -1.21 +1.53 0.983 49.6% +22 -169 -79 54.5% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +1.42 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56
25 2019 1750 134.4 -2.18 +0.80 0.942 48.7% -10 -123 -200 48.0% -0.28 8–6 (57%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 +0.31 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06
26 2020 1768 132.2 +0.85 +2.96 1.090 51.7% -8 — — 58.3% +0.58 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.03 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77
27 2021 1686 121.1 -1.18 -0.16 0.941 48.6% -18 -68 — 38.7% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.36 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
30 2024 1548 93.3 -2.71 -2.47 0.779 44.6% -4 — — 26.7% -1.73 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.51 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
31 2025 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.05 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13
Career — 1777 123.8 -2.10 +0.33 0.915 48.0% +3 -88 -35 41.7% -0.74 31–38 (45%) 23–16 (59%) 104.4 +1.33 — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.