H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 1–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Saisai Zheng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2014 Hong Kong fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-4 6-2 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |